EconomistAsia.net loveq= hemisphere of nations share girls' dream to end poverty

how to celebrate 2.5 bn asian millennials leading sd goal generation

Consequences what happens when America's richest programmer bill gates reviews Ezra Vogel- Asia-America's kindest connector.
.. Macraes' last 100 trips to Asia - they started with dad Norman Macrae teen serving in allied bomber command (today's Myanmar)-
The Economist became min diary of Norman Macrae's half century of asian trips from Myanmar 1943 on- we archive that at normanmacrae.net economistjapan.com; connection of my 50 trips with 5 generations of my family in Asia only made full sense from 2001 and mostly
15 trips to Bangladesh thanks to interviews with Fazle Abed & friends 1 2 3 and young chinese scholars at his 80th birthday filled most gaps EconomistPoor.com .. Asia trips 1 to 51 india -1-3 1984-2004; indonesia 4-7 (1982-1994) ; singapore 8-10 (1982-1992) japan (11-17) 1985-2013; thailand (18.19) 1984-1995 ; malaysia (20-21) ; 1993 korea (22-23); 1990-2017 bangladesh (24-39) 2007-2018;
dubai (40,41) 2015,6; qatar(42) 2017; china (43-50) 2016-2019 hong kong 51 (1996) like 7 members of my scotttish family tree i have enjoyed the huge privilege of learning more about advancing the human lot from the two thirds who are asian than my own race caucasian
...united ; ASIA/MIDDLE EAST: Afghanistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh & women, Bhutan, Brunei, Cambodia, China, Cyprus, Georgia, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, North Korea, South Korea, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Lebanon/yemen, Malaysia, Maldives, Mongolia, Myanmar (Burma), Nepal, Oman, Pakistan, Philippines, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Singapore-Asean, Sri Lanka, Syria, Taiwan, Tajikistan, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Turkey, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, Vietnam, -eurasia, Russia- we list twice because most of its land is in asia but traditionally its capital and history is categorised as european....Mapping livelihood economics of two thirds of humans- in 1983 london scot james wilson started the economist as a newsletter of royal societies chattering classes- his initial goal ro end poverty and starv=ation in scotland and nearest islands london ruled over- 17 years later queen victoria sent wilson to calcutta with charter bank to end poverty wherever britain ruled over asia; sadly james died 9 months after landing of diarrhea; it took another 120 years before bangladesh, china and unicef taught every village mother how to cure diarrhea with a recipe of water sugar and salts; from this first open source health service, a billion women across the continent spent 1970-2020 ending extreme poverty - with the help of universities who knew fazle abed vest, at www.abedmooc.com we track how/why the world used bangladesh as its lab for solutions that worked without access to electricity or any of the engineering that glasgow gave to the world from 1760; some people ask what happened to the economist mission- you can read 2nd editor walter bagehot's attempts to help victoria journey to commowealth at the english constituition; but progress was to slow to prevent the colonial eara where whites 15% designed world trade to exclude most of human development in the economist's 1943 centenary biography; at that tie my dad was teenage navigator in alied bomber command stationed in modrnday myanma; the east end of the bay of bengal opposite to calcutta's west end; what happened next to bay of bengal - yuo'd thnk kamala harris and berkeley let alone howard alumni would urgenrly follow coming from her mothers'schennai- in a hasty retreat from responsibility anywhere the british raj had rlued -india eas partioned; calcutta the superport of asoa's 19th century was assigned to india; the rest of the bay was given to pakistan to rule; it took 24 years for bangladeshi people to win back indepenence now the 8th most populous nation with less than zero capital; my father norman macrae mapped varios asian economic models from 1962 when he first surveyed hs war time foe japan - he named the model poorest villagers would need to network rural kensianism; while he named the win-win supercity/port model of tokyo capital belt roadtsrs; for the next 30 years those who saw the economist as the first viewspaper for debating globalisation exponentials were trewed to regular updates on every asian peoples progess or not in sharing these new economic modelsSustainability's last chance decade: Feb 2021 2025report.com 37th annual update- economistpoor.com - thanks to hard work of asian motherhood, one billion asians have ended extreme poverty in the last 40 years - research shows human development's greatest lesson is not yet a curriculum in any western university -can you help adamsmith.app change economists before year end summits in Glasgow 1 2 & Dubai -try applying Economist alphabet Ai Bank Child Diary Edu Food Green Health Inclusion ..my scottish family's concern for development of two thirds of humans who are Asian goes bac 150+ years to founding of the pharmacy kemp's corner in mumbai to grandad's sir kenneth kemp's 25 years of mediation with gandhi leading to sir ken's last project wrining up the legalese of india's independence to my father's 40 years reporting asia's sustainability entrepreneurial revolution in The Economist; to his last article 20 years later on lessons from bangladesh needed to rectify the west's subprime disaster: japan's ambassador to dhaka helped aspiring youth journalists and others listen to sir fazle abed legacy debriefs - see our catalogue abed.games offering the most vital alumni networks youth can linkin if they are to celebrate being the first sustainability generation REFERENCES UN ENVOY EDUCATION -asia has proven to be greates champion of former uk prime minister Gordon brown -10 years un envoy edu links include A 1 2 lots of moving parts - some are very radical empowering new universities and apprenticeships - I have been tracking the for 5 years since being at un launch 2016 - can try and help with queries chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk - if real summits return end 2021 hope to unite updates cop26 nov Glasgow and worlds largest edu summit allied to uae expo dec -meanwhile zooms can make connections
..

Friday, April 3, 2020

korea month april 2020 this post aug 2020



Korea IT Times
Search
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Join
  • Mobile
  • HOME
  • KOREAN EDITION
    • 뉴스인브리프
    • 뉴스투데이
    • 이슈
    • 컴퍼니 포커스
    • 인더스트리 & 테크놀로지
    • 인더스트리
    • People & Interview
    • Column
  • ICT Special
  • BUSINESS
  • World News
  • VIDEO
  • ABOUT US

Korea IT Times
The future of the US-ROK and US-Japan Alliances

HOME  HOME  Editorials
The future of the US-ROK and US-Japan Alliances
  •  Emanuel Pastreich(epastreich@protonmail.com)
  •  승인 2020.08.03 08:00
  •  댓글 0





Emanuel Pastreich, Candidate for President of the United States(Independent)
Emanuel Pastreich, Candidate for President of the United States(Independent)


The recent declaration by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo that engagement with China is dead and that cooperation with China has come to an end in just about every field marks a historic shift. We can already see a massive campaign unfolding to promote suspicion about any interaction with China and a call has gone out for so-called “decoupling” for the United States, but also for its traditional partners in Northeast Asia South Korea and Japan.
This campaign must be seen in the context of President Obama’s signing of the bill HR 4310 in 2012 that authorizes the use of propaganda against US citizens, thereby ending the restrictions imposed by the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948. The recent statements of Secretary Pompeo take this propaganda to a new high, and the wave is entirely bipartisan. 
Secretary Pompeo stated,
“If we want to have a free 21st century, the old paradigm of blind engagement with China must be replaced by a strategy to ensure the free world will triumph over this new tyranny (of China).”
Secretary of State Pompeo’s evocation of reductionist Cold War rhetoric clearly marks a shift, granted that it can also be described as the latest stage in a process of confrontation driven by the radical anti-China faction in the United States military and in American politics that backed President Trump in his campaign from early on. The fact that the Democratic Party is incapable of articulating an alternative vision for US-China relations, and that Presidential candidate Joe Biden has even gone as far as to accuse Trump of coddling China as a means to score political points suggests that we are seeing a transformation of American political culture. 
We are in uncharted territory now and the rapid shifts we have seen over the last few weeks, from calls for regime change in Beijing to the dispatch of aircraft carrier groups to the South China Sea with unprecedented and unjustified frequency suggests there is a consensus in Washington D.C. on the political value of the China threat. Extreme xenophobic claims have become the norm. That unfortunate trend has combined with the virtual shutdown of the State Department as a functional institution.  
The mainstream press is nearly universal in its description of a “new Cold War.” I think that the circumstances are profoundly different from the original Cold War and that new elements, such as technological integration and climate change, make such a description deeply misleading.   
Certainly, Pompeo’s comments at the Nixon Library in which he declared, unilaterally, an end to engagement as he ham-fistedly buried five decades of engagement in a shallow grave at precisely the moment that the Artic is melting and releasing catastrophic levels of methane gas, was a shameful moment. I would like to say that we are seeing how “cold wars repeat: first as tragedies and again as farce.” 
Let us come back to where we are right now. No, let me start with who I am right now. I am an American trained at Yale and Harvard as an expert on East Asia. I spent a total of seven years in Japan and a total of almost 14 years in Korea in the course of my life, and I taught Americans about Korean and Japanese history and culture for 14 years of my career.  
The question of what the US-Korea Alliance and the US Japan Alliance mean is in a state of flux today. The confusion as to what the relationship is and what the purpose of the alliance is has become so tenuous and so charged that most in polite company avoid the topic. 
It would be wise for me to avoid the topic too, Yet, I am compelled to take it on head on. The role of the United States in East Asia is a critical question for us today and we must confront the two basic facts.First, if the United States does not play a constructive role and does not engage in an effort to present an inspiring vision for the future, the risk of serious conflict is high and the risk that the United States will completely lose its mandate in Northeast Asia is higher. 
The assumption behind the radical rhetoric of Mike Pompeo is that the United States and its military allies in Northeast Asia, especially the Republic of Korea and Japan, will fall in line behind this new cold war agenda, and the push for an “arc of democracy” –a new term for the military cooperation between Australia, India. South Korea and Japan. These countries are under enormous pressure to fall in line and take a hostile position towards China and to rapidly “decouple” from China in terms of manufacturing, distribution and finance. 
Let me say a word about decoupling from China to make my position clear. The globalization of finance, industrial production and distribution that ties these countries together, and tethers them to China, has not been an unmitigated blessing and we will not go back to that previous paradigm, nor should we. 
The environment has been destroyed, workers horribly exploited and tremendous resources wasted in the pursuit of short-term profit and glorified consumption happiness in the United States, in Asia and around the world. 
But if we need to move back to local production, to organic farming and to healthy communities by decoupling from unaccountable global production and distribution networks, that does not mean a rabid hostility towards China, one-sixth of the population of the Earth and the core of the current global economy. 
No, quite the opposite is required. We need to work more closely with Chinese scholars, policymakers, local government and above all with ordinary citizens. We need connections with China at the level of partnerships between elementary schools in Korea, China, Japan and the United States so that we can learn about each other and cooperate from a young age. We need more consortiums to address global warming and the crisis in the Artic made up of teams from the United States, Korea, Japan and China. We need above all to be creative about how we will work together.
What we can be sure of is that the current radical arguments in Washington D.C. have connection to the long-term interests of the people of South Korea, Japan or the United States. We have tolerated such political rhetoric in the past, but it has lapsed into dangerous territory and if we continue along this road, even if war or climate catastrophe is avoided, the United States role in East Asia will be permanently altered. The United States cannot rally a coalition of the willing against China in the way it tried to do against Iraq in another age. Such an effort is suicidal for the United States, and for humanity, at this critical moment.
The origins of the alliance system 
The US-Japan alliance has its roots in the 1951 U.S.-Japan Mutual Security Treaty which postulated the threat of communism as a reason for the United States to provide security to Japan as it rebuilt its economy. It was linked directly to the Korean War which fundamentally altered the relationship of the United States with China and Russia. The United States and South Korea established their formal Mutual Defense Treaty in 1953, after the Korean War, a treaty which has evolved into a tremendous bureaucracy and produced enormous budgets for weapons systems.
That alliance system took form as part of the ideological fight between the United States and the Soviet Union (but more importantly, within the United States) as the previous consensus on the need for a new international approach to governance, a consensus that formed the backbone of the anti-fascism alliance of the 1930s and the 1940s took a back seat.   
The United States and the Soviet Union worked together as allies against the ruthless fascist push to destroy wide swaths of humanity in the pursuit of profit, both were fighting against an agenda of eugenics that assumed much of humanity had no right to exist.
Getting right the historical and cultural significance of the Korean War, and the US-ROK and US-Japan alliances is essential to making the rapid transition to the next stage of the alliances so they to address emerging threats that are unlike anything encountered in the last 70 years. 
As an American trained as an Asia expert who has spent a career trying to understand Asia, the question of what the United States' role has been, and what is will be, is critical. It is not morally responsible to simply follow directives from politicians who understand nothing of Asia except its financial value to their patrons.
There are numerous examples of Americans, and of American institutions, that have made positive contributions in Korea and in Japan. But those efforts were mixed with other, far less benign, activities.
As the United States turns back to extreme isolationism, as racist and anti-Asian rhetoric spills out from the corporate media, as we see the commitment in the United States to Korea and to Japan increasingly conditional on the sales of weapons, the hyping of a China threat and a North Korea threat, the greatest danger is that American contributions will be buried in a wave of anti-American sentiment. We can already see that wave coming even as the newspapers tell us that it is the China threat we must be concerned with. 
We must also remember that the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 was aimed at Chinese, but was later extended to severely limit immigration from Japan and Korea and that it was the result of a broad “Yellow Peril” campaign that made no distinction between the nations of Asia. We can see precisely the same patterns today.
When Mao Zedong made his declaration of the People's Republic of China on October 3, 1949, the United States was pushed by domestic factions to move away from the anti-fascism alliance with the Soviet Union, and the efforts to avoid taking a stand against the Chinese Communist Party. Pro-business groups in the United States campaigned for close affiliation with the British Empire, for the United States to take advantage of the opportunities for power and financial advantage to be gained from accepting the mantle of the decayed London-based global system. The battle against fascism, the battle against eugenics and racism, were drowned out by a cynical campaign of "Who lost China?"
That campaign was designed to remove all sense of complexity about the political and economic situation and to make the United States the bastion for an anti-communist global campaign. It was a tragic choice that was made in Washington D.C. The United Nations was not able to realize its sacred mission as an international organization and the gates were opened for a treacherous form of globalism that would lead the United States in a dangerous direction from the 1990s on.
The Senate Internal Security Subcommittee was formed in 1950 in the United States and set out to destroy thoughtful Americans who tried to cooperate with the Chinese Communist Party in any way in the pursuit of peace. Most notable was the attack on the thoughtful and insightful Chinese scholar Owen Lattimore for his promotion of the investigation of the truth. That campaign made cooperation impossible and permanently altered the United States' role in Korea, and in East Asia. The battle against fascism, against colonialism, against racism ―a battle that had been supported by many thoughtful Americans ― was buried. 
Where do we stand today, 70 years later? The United States still has thousands of troops in South Korea and Japan. The Korean Peninsula is still divided. The political establishment in Washington D.C. and in Seoul and Tokyo assumes that somehow the United States must have troops here forever. There is no vision at all for when American troops will go home, or how a peace regime will be established in East Asia and the Korean Peninsula reunited. 
The new “Cold War” 
Although the newspapers tell us of the increasingly close working relationship between the United States, South Korea and Japan, I can tell you as an Asia expert who has worked on Asia issues with the governments of all three countries for the last twenty years, that I do not see that to be the case. There may be bigger budgets for weapons systems, and more articles describing a new Cold War, but on the ground, I see fewer American experts in Seoul and Tokyo (and quarantine had reduced that number even further).
In Washington D.C., where I was until February, I saw a State Department and Department of Defense essentially stripped of people who understand Korea, Japan and China (and it is increasingly difficult for people who know China to get security clearance). I met friends of mine from my last tour in Washington D.C. who know Asia well and who once were regularly briefing the White House. They are not playing any role now. 
Nor is this shift a creation of the Trump administration. The Democratic and Republican Parties have been happy to trash expertise and rely on caricatures and staw men to describe the complex economic and security relationship with Northeast Asia. 
What must the alliances become in the future?
Our only choice as intellectuals, as American diplomats, academics, journalists and lawyers, is for us to openly condemn the racist and reductive efforts to blame the worst of American culture, the decadence and corruption which I watched first-hand paralyze policy on Asia in Washington D.C. last year. 
We need now, not next month, or next administration, a new vision for America's role in Asia, and in the world, that makes a clean break from the destructive habit of promoting conflict, competition, containment and consumption. We can, we must, embrace a vision based on cooperation, coexistence, climate science and cultural exchange.
Part of that transformation must include a return to the original inspiration of the alliance system. The alliances established when the United States recognized for the first time formally Korean independence at the 1941 Moscow Conference and combined forces with Nationalists and Communists in China, and with the Soviet Union, were alliances focused on the battle against fascism. And that meant at the time Fascism at home and abroad, the efforts of small interest groups to use racism, militarism, essentialism and the debasing of science and intellectual discourse as means to achieve complete power. It was true for the Nazi Party as it was for the Ku Klux Klan in the United States in the 1930s. 
We are facing on all fronts a threat from fascism today, in varied new forms. That threat, and not an imagined threat from “communism,” must be the focus of our global alliance as it was before, in Korea, Japan and across Asia. 
The term “alliance” suggests a conflict, a war. That is a danger in that it encourages a state of war in order to preserve the alliance and undermines peace. But at the same time, we are in such a perilous state now, one in which totalitarianism and fascism are creeping into every airport, every convenience store and on to every TV broadcast globally. Such a campaign is demanded up us again. 
But it is an open distortion to suggest that it is China that poses the threat. China is wrestling with exactly the same demons that we are wrestling with today in Washington D.C., Seoul and Tokyo. All these capitals are dominated by the power of investment banks, the super-rich, and the ruthless supercomputers that work day and night to exploit our precious Earth for short-term profits. 
We will promote cooperation between Koreans, Japanese and Americans to respond to the true security challenges of the 21st century. The development of nuclear weapons by the Democratic People's Republic of Korea is not anywhere near the top of that list and the question of nuclear weapons on the Korean Peninsula cannot be solved until the United States itself completely commits itself to the principles of the Nonproliferation Treaty and sets out a plan for the United States to quickly get rid of all the nuclear weapons that remain in our country.
There will be a struggle, but it must be one that is inspiring, based on the pursuit of a scientific approach to policy, and that brings back the best of the American traditions of internationalism dormant since the 1950s.  
I cannot support Donald Trump's rhetoric, especially the racist message of "Make American Great Again." But I will say that, with the help of all citizens of Korea, of Japan, of Northeast Asia and of our precious Earth, we can work together to give hope again to the discouraged and the oppressed. In that process, I believe, we can take the first steps towards making America great for the first time.
Responding to the overwhelming threat of the four horsemen of the apocalypse
Peace and security in Northeast Asia are not limited to discussions between high-ranking diplomats and politicians. Americans should work with all thoughtful, brave and peace-loving Koreans and Japanese, and all others who will join with us.
Security will be a critical part of that project. But we will have to redefine security. Security must be a global response to the four horsemen of the apocalypse. 
Who are the four horsemen of the apocalypse? 
Well, at this point, the term "apocalypse" is no longer hyperbole. The apocalypse is no longer for fundamentalists anymore. "Halleluiah! I believe!"
The first horseman of the apocalypse is the collapse of the climate, the death of the oceans, the spread of deserts and horrific destruction of biodiversity brought on by the thoughtless pursuit of consumption and growing economy.
The second horseman of the apocalypse is the radical concentration of wealth in the hands of a few billionaires who plot now to control finance and currency completely through their supercomputer networks and to create a human-free economy for their own profit and amusement.
The third horseman of the apocalypse is the rapid evolution of technology that is rendering humans as passive animals that have lost all agency and are incapable of meaningful political action. This transformation is pushed forward by the promotion of artificial intelligence and automation in a cynical effort to dumb down citizens through the promotion of consumption.
The fourth horseman of the apocalypse is the extreme militarization of the economy, often out of sight for citizens, which has set off an unlimited global arms race on land, on the oceans, and now even in space that could easily be the end of humanity.
These horrific developments must be the focus of an international effort to create a sustainable future for our children and that effort must be at the center of any cooperation between the United States, Korea and Japan. To put it more sharply, if cooperation with Korea is not directly related to a concrete and immediate response to those four horsemen of the apocalypse, then that cooperation should stop. We do not have the funds, the manpower, or the time to pursue projects that are unrelated to the central imperative of saving humanity.
An American vision for Northeast Asia 
The United States must play a leadership role. That does not mean praying before the false idols of war propped up by Lockheed Martin and Booz Allen Hamilton, insisting that the only thing that matters is weapons systems, free trade agreements and more weapons systems. 
We must put forth a vision for the future of Northeast Asia and of the world that is about global governance with a focus on the Earth and on local governance. True science, education, ethics and new models for participatory democracy must inform this vision for the United States, at home and abroad. 
I will close by suggesting that cooperation between South Korea, Japan and the United States can be directed to a successful path forward towards the unification of the Korean Peninsula. This unification project offers us a tremendous opportunity, one that comes only once in 500 years, an opportunity for us to lay the foundations for a nation that will engage in critical innovations and will not only offer inspiration for its citizens, but a new hope for all citizens on Earth.
Koreans, North and South, can create new institutions on a massive scale that cannot be easily done in other nations precisely because Korea is in the midst of institutional transformation. Korea can end the use of fossil fuels, create finance that is focused on citizens, not international investment banks and pursue an honest and brave internationalism that brings us together for true cooperation.
The frugal and modest lives of North Korean are not something that must be quickly replaced by mindless consumption or thoughtless development. If anything, North Korea is perfectly positioned to be a nation that is 100 percent fossil-fuel-free. North Korea can take the brave position that the minerals and the coal beneath its forests and fields shall remain there, untouched by multinational corporations because the people, and the ecosystem, are far more valuable than money.
That model can be imported back into South Korea, Japan and the United States. The fact that North Korea does not have many automobiles, that it is not automated, can be its strength, not its weakness. I look forward to a day when South Korea, Japan and the United States are as dark at night as North Korea is. 
Japanese and Americans can help in that project for North Korea, and for a healthy and sustainable Northeast Asia. But American and Japanese investment banks and wealthy speculators should not play any role whatsoever. 
Let us go forward together, with bravery, ready for self-sacrifice, ready to do our best to end this consumption-driven extraction economy, to address the peril of climate change and to create a culture for cooperation in education, true science, the arts and moral philosophy, one that will bring the United States, South Korea and Japan together as a true team dedicated to internationalism via people and ideals, not supercomputers calculating profits. 
저작권자 © Korea IT Times 무단전재 및 재배포 금지
Emanuel Pastreich(epastreich@protonmail.com)
Emanuel Pastreich(epastreich@protonmail.com)
Posted by chris macrae at 2:05 PM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
FROM 1977

 


Two Billion People: A Survey of Asia | Foreign Affairs

https://www.foreignaffairs.com › reviews › capsule-review
One of them is communist China, which has been following a policy which Macrae calls "rural Keynesianism." The others are "capitalist roaders" such as South ...
.

 

The unacknowledged giant | The Economist

https://www.economist.com › ... › Jun 19th 2010 edition
Jun 17, 2010 — Norman was the first journalist to “discover” Japan. In 1962 he wrote a survey predicting that a country most Westerners regarded as synonymous ...

  • An unacknowledged giant | The Economist

    https://www.economist.com › schumpeter › 2010/06/23
    Jun 23, 2010 — Norman Macrae was one of the twentieth century's great visionaries | Schumpeter.

Norman Macrae - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Norman_Macrae
Norman Alastair Duncan Macrae CBE (1923 – 11 June 2010) was a British economist, journalist and author, considered by some to have been one of the world's ...
Date of death: 11 June 2010
‎Career · ‎Books

The 2025 Report: A Concise History of the Future, 1975-2025

https://www.amazon.com › 2025-Report-Concise-Histor...
Norman Macrae worked at The Economist, spanning 5 decades as its most prolific editorial writer, during a period which saw the paper grow from 4th ranked ...

Norman Macrae - The Atlantic

https://www.theatlantic.com › archive › 2010/06 › nor...
Jun 18, 2010 — A remarkable man you never heard of died last week. In a splendid obituary The Economist salutes the creator of its intellectual identity.

Will Remote Working Replace The Office? : Planet Money - NPR

https://www.npr.org › transcripts
Aug 11, 2021 — ROSALSKY: It was written by the deputy editor of The Economist. His name was Norman Macrae. And Macrae said that, basically, this newfangled ...

Mr. Norman Macrae | IT History Society

https://www.ithistory.org › honor-roll › mr-norman-ma...
He joined The Economist in 1949 and retired as its deputy chief editor in 1988. He foresaw the Pacific century, the reversal of nationalization of ...

The coming entrepreneurial revolution : a survey - EconBiz

https://www.econbiz.de › Record › the-coming-entrepre...
Authors: Macrae, Norman. Published in: The economist. - London : Economist, ISSN 0013-0613, ZDB-ID 1806-5. - Vol. 261.1976, p. 41-65. Subject: Unternehmer ...

End-Poverty Economics Dictionary by (Oriental) Friends of ...

https://www.linkedin.com › pulse › end-poverty-economi...
May 17, 2018 — ... Dictionary by (Oriental) Friends of The Economist's Norman Macrae ... hardest with Norman mainly died before he did- so The Economist ...

  • Chris Macrae MA DAMTP Cantab - LinkedIn

    https://www.linkedin.com › unwomens
    Foundation Norman Macrae ERworld.tv , The Economist's Unacknowledged Giant. valuetrue.com 9500 investors in millenials = most connected educated ...

The Economics of the Office: Why Do We Still Commute?

https://psmag.com › Economics
Oct 30, 2017 — It wasn't supposed to be this way—at least according to Norman Macrae. ... Macrae, an influential journalist for The Economist who earned a ...

BOOKS of LIFE WRITING - Plunkett Lake Press

https://plunkettlakepress.com › ...
Norman Macrae (1923-2010) served in the Royal Air Force as a navigator in ... earning his Ph.D. when The Economist offered him a temporary job in 1949.

Finding miracles – Norman Macrae | Ben Bansal

https://benbansal.me › ...
Jan 21, 2013 — The Economist's anonymity policy makes it somewhat difficult for individual journalists to rise to fame. It's thus not surprising that the ...

How to Advise Hi-Trust Leaders on Growing Young ... - GHDonline

https://www.ghdonline.org › uploads › health_ent...
DOC
-Celebrating Open Society Curricula of The Economist's Entrepreneurial Revolutionary Norman Macrae. This book offers both actionable future maps to play ...

Britain & Japan: Biographical Portraits, Vol. IX on JSTOR

https://www.jstor.org › stable
27 Norman Macrae (1921–2010): Pioneering Journalist of The Economist on Japanese Affairs. (pp. 309-318). BILL EMMOTT and ADRIAN WOOLRIDGE.

Books: Norman Macrae - Edward Betts

https://edwardbetts.com › monograph › Norman_Macrae
Von Neumann may have been a famous genius, but according to Norman Macrae, ... Norman Macrae was a stalwart of The Economist for half a century: he joined ...

The Coming Entrepreneurial Revolution - Mind the Post

https://pacojariego.me › 2016/04/24 › the-coming-entre...
Apr 24, 2016 — Featured Image: “The coming entrepreneurial revolution”, a survey in The Economist of December 25, 1976, Norman Macrae ...

1. In 1972, Norman Macrae, an editor at the | Chegg.com

https://www.chegg.com › questions-and-answers › 1-19...
This question hasn't been solved yet · 1. In 1972, Norman Macrae, an editor at the Economist, speculated prophetically about a time in the future, please ...

Unacknowledged GiantанаThe Economist Obituary of The Net ...

http://www.truevaluemetrics.org › NormanMacrae
PDF
Jul 5, 2016 — The Economist's ptoyouth economist, Norman Macrae, died June 2010аа. ;аHis 40 year of work on the Entrepreneurial Revolution curriculum of ...

Norman Borlaug saved millions of lives, would his critics ...

https://allianceforscience.cornell.edu › blog › 2020/04
Apr 24, 2020 — Well, as we know, something did happen: the Green Revolution. The hundreds of millions of people who may have starved in India and elsewhere did ...

Obituary: Norman Macrae, journalist | The Scotsman

https://www.scotsman.com › News › Obituaries
Jun 27, 2010 — A popular figure around the offices at the Economist, Macrae was regarded fondly for his inability to iron clothing, clean his shoes or wear ...

John von Neumann: The Scientific Genius Who Pioneered the ...

https://www.maa.org › press › maa-reviews › john-von-...
Norman Macrae's book on the life (and, to some extent, the work) of John von Neumann ... (Macrae, a journalist who at one time was editor of The Economist, ...

Search This Blog

............................................................,,,,,,...................................................................


































































































































































































































































.

#Reiwa1 japan and south korea and china including diaspora - from 1968 - how the greatest engineers came together

#Reiwa2 japan and uk and europe from 1964 - how prince charles invited japan and the euriopena union never to war again

#Reiwa3 japan and east asian coast to singapore, Hong Kong and asean by 1968 - how container shipping/superports became the world's win-win trading route with ever smaller enterprises webbing just-in-time supply chains

#Reiwa4 japan and australia/new zealand and south pacific and asean

#Reiwa5 japan and india-bangladesh still emerging but with several leapfrog interventions

#Reiwa6 japan and central asia with or without russia

#Reiwa7 japan and africa ticad since circa 1988

#Reiwa0 in all of the above there was pof course the relationship between japan and usa

girls history q 1 - whats number 1 rule of governing end poverty networks
.................................................................................................................x

xhow mightthe peoples of asia pacifc celebrate development since the UN formed escap in 1947- by the late 1950s thanks to americans borlaug and deming miracles began around japan rising which connected major far east islands taiwan hk singpaore and south korea penisular; by 1968 china had ended any belief that russia was leading the way its peoples wanted to be freed after 110 yers of withdrawing from world trade rather than accept the british proposition that opium be used as a currency-three miracles in one emerged by the late 1970s: china adapted rural keynsianism and women lift up half the sky focusing on barefoot medic networks and rice green revolution- the disapora chiense were now the 3rd strongest finacial network and the fastest growing one- they wanted to inward invets in the mainland- deng after surveying us, germany and japan concluded only japans engineering leaders had the knowhow china most needed - the mniracle of over a billion chinese being lifted out ofpoverty began; it took almost 20 years more before a team around manmohan singh opened up india to trade- sadly the indians model didnt distribute rural health and education as deeply as china did- added to this the nation with the ekast resources of all at its birth 1971 showed what women can build out of vilages , hard work and for 3 decades no access to electricity grods or telecoms - from late 1990s bangladesh became a world epicentre of leapfrog models - eg solar for electricity, text mobiule banking for hundreds of millions of unbanked

most exciting times to be

alive


UNWOMENS



WHY INDIA NEEDS TO LOVE CHINA NOW NOT ENGLISH SPEAKING CHIEFS


If whole Eurasian continent had been 10 degrees more to south, mercantile co,lonia half of millennium 2 might never have happened; the north coastal belt could have been easy to navigate as happy Euro North route to china's east coast is now, and british empire would never have decimate india's economy just because india blocked sialing routes to .



Can you help us B C U ... see to: wherever you parent girls that the miracles of china and bangladesh 1972-2017 resonate through every education system including WISE summits at UNGA (new york sept 2018) at Paris March (2019), at the 2nd 100 nations rebirth of Belt Road Imagines may 2019 beijing BRI- school mba systems ???


Happy 175 James--Our hopes that scots, economist and media people could help end poverty began 175 years ago with this charter for all world class branding colaborations of end poverty


We have made such arrangements and under such superintendence, as will secure the accomplishment of all that we propose, in a way which we trust will render our objects and exertions useful to the country: we have no party or class interests or motives; we are of no class, or rather of every class: we are of the landowning class: we are of the commercial class interested in our colonies, in our foreign trade, and in our manufactures: but our opinions are that not one part of these can have any lasting and true success that is not associated and co-existing with the prosperity of all.

And lastly—if we required higher motives than bare utility, to induce that zeal, labour, and perseverance against all the difficulties which we shall have to encounter in this work—we have them. If we look abroad, we see within the range of our commercial intercourse whole islands and continents, on which the light of civilization has scarce yet dawned; and we seriously believe that FREE TRADE, free intercourse, will do more than any other visible agent to extend civilization and morality throughout the world—yes, to extinguish slavery itself. Then, if we look around us at home, we see ignorance, depravity, immorality, irreligion, abounding to an extent disgraceful to a civilized country;

and we feel assured that there is little chance of successfully treating this great national disease while want and pauperism so much abound: we can little hope to improve the mental and moral condition of a people while their physical state is so deplorable:—personal experience has shown us in the manufacturing districts that the people want no acts of parliament to coerce education or induce moral improvement when they are in physical comfort—and that, when men are depressed with want and hunger, and agonized by the sufferings of helpless and starving children, no acts of parliament are of the slightest avail.

more
-james died in kolkata- instead of his vision charter banking this port as mid 19th C gateway to win-win trade new belt road between china bangaldesh and india, the opium wars forced china to wall off a fifth of the world's most creative people for over 100 years- this was an even greater loss to the artistic freedom of man than the steady decline of venice and the whjole med sea region from 1500 as mercantile rukers of waves win-lose trades replaced half a millennium of celebrating the amazing grace of silk road traders- flash forward to 1972, make sure wherever you parent girls that the miracles of china and bangaldesh 1972-2017 resonate trough every education system including wise summits at UNGA (spet 2018) at Paris March (2019), at the 2nd 100 nations rebirth of Belt Road Inspires may 2019 BRI- school mba systems



This blog would like to include special country months eg Korea -lift up half the sky : searching for ladies who see jobs as most basic human right 1 2


online library of norman macrae--


q1 2018 videos worth discussing wherever stidnets meet


0:48 / 1:53

Up next
AUTOPLAY
8:13

JP Morgan Listens to Lessons from Kenya Microcredit Jamii Bora

microeconomist
1.1K views
21:39

Laudato Si: A Physicist Discuses Climate Change and Pope Francis’s Challenge

University of Dayton
Recommended for you
5:41

Bill Gates Discusses How To Fix Capitalism | TIME

TIME
614K views
1:22

demos5

microeconomist
19 views
26:48

Director John Pilger: Disastrous consequences if US proceeds with “policy of provocation”

CGTN
Recommended for you
12:46

Chinese engineers plan 1,000km tunnel to make Xinjiang desert bloom

Spirit martial arts
Reco


Posted by chris macrae at 9:21 AM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

Tuesday, September 5, 2017

In a declaration, the BRICS(Brazil-Russia-India-China- South Africa -togeteher with 5 guests Egypt, Guinea.., Tajikistan, Mexico and Thailand) called upon all nations to adopt a comprehensive approach in combating terrorism including countering radicalisation and blocking terror financing sources. Here is the full text ofXiamen Declaration

Xiamen, China, 4 September 2017

3 is it still possible for 2024 to live up to this 1984 goal for changing education (Norman Macrae 1 & Chris Macrae 2024/5 report)

peoplecentredeconomics.JPG follow the Ma: jack has spent since 1994 searching for where big-small chnage will come to chich markets - so fast moving consumer goods chnaged by ecommerce; finance and social sharing markets eg bikes by mobile apps-clouds; furniture by OTO; jobs education and happiness sectors by 1 refugee and bodrer crossings, 2 expereintial learning olympics and the games of education of youth as sustainability goals generation on every belt road map se are the most exciting times to be ali


linking in fans of BRAC and planetMOOC

Edit

bracnet and worldyouthcommunity.com welcome you - text us 240 316 8157 with email for invitation to join BRACnet and help develop the MOOCs sustainability youth need to share with each other - isabella@unacknowledgedgiant.com

4 education &

17 Youth-public-private partnering

1 end poverty

2 zero hunger

3 good health wellbeing

5 gender equality

6 clean water sanitation

7 affordable clean energy

8 decent work

economic growth

9 industry, innovation, infrastructure

10 reduce inequality

11 sustainable cities communities

12 responsible consumption and production

13 climate action

14 life below water

15 life on land

16 peace & justice========

come co-blog with us

- we are converting several blogs into synonyms webs using google $12 dollar a year rental scheme


COLLAB INVITE 7 summits 2018-2019
previously

what does east and worldwide youth want from open learning -2015 dialogue, due Tokyo late june- opportunity to test 5 billion person elearning satellite

q 1 can community health open elearning training unite hemispheres (lead nets: Partners in Health origin americas, brac origin muslim bangladesh, medicins sans frontieres
the japanese parties likely to include those representing corporate world like toyota, tokyo university and national higher ed policy, ambassadors and eg JICA and thru abdul latif mit labs- why tokyo father Norman Macrae earned The Emperors highest international award for his teams at The Economist helping japan choose future sectors of world trade
Our family's work has tracked doubling of global coms spend every 7 years since 1946 -that's 4000 fold by 2030 in terms of whats sustainable





Home
Diarrhea Curriculum - Valung India's and Health Networks Greatest Innovation for Sustainability
Introducing You to World Record Games of Job Creation
women and youth manage poverty. so why not heart of development
Losing Sustainability- the greatest intergenerational mistake?

ABOUT OUR FRIENDS NETWORKS 1 2
Trust-flow mapping has been core of scottish economics since 1748 and Franciscan Community Development since 2008- valuetrue and POP key leadership metric : integenerational sustainability exponentials; unlie ting revolutions wen Te Economist was born to mdeiate end of hunger, millennials need help in mediating communications (now the sector tat most money and human lives are spent on -future shockingly from about 5% in 1950 to about 25% in 2010s)

Remembering
Author of Asia Rising
Author of Japan Rising
Leader of singapore rising
who else?

which other pro-yout economical ways has asia contributed to sustaining millennials:
worlds best superports
worlds best womens village investment banking and mobile tec infrastructures
worlds best quality systems and fast moving sector visions mapping back from future goals
...
.
20 years ago Jim Rohwer published Asia Rising and was plotting launching the equivalent of The Economist in Asia. (some personal research available by dad Norman macrae if you can give us context of interest). While Jim's super optimistic book has in many ways turned out to be under-optimistic sadly he died in a boating accident. If anyone's an alumni of Asia Rising we love to be contacted chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk - and I will be making as many lins as I can to the references of what was explorable in 1995. Asia's development was then and is now the best news anyone can have the privilege of diarising.






























































































































































ut 14 results (0.67 seconds)

Search Results

  1. Asia Rising: Why America Will Prosper as Asia's Economies Boom

    https://books.google.com/books?isbn=0684825481
    Jim Rowher - 1996 - ‎Business & Economics
    Chapter 1 (The Miracle) In general Norman Macrae, "Two Billion People," The Economist (May 7, 1977). Jim Rohwer, "A Billion Consumers," The Economist ...
  2. Remade in America: How Asia Will Change Because America Boomed

    https://books.google.com/books?isbn=0609504126
    Jim Rohwer - 2001 - ‎Business & Economics
    How Asia Will Change Because America Boomed Jim Rohwer ... Norman Macrae, a former deputy editor of TheEconomist and probably the best financial ...
  3. The Economist in China: Old hands | The Economist

    www.economist.com/blogs/analects/.../economist-china
    The Economist
    Feb 27, 2012 - As it happens, Norman Macrae, the then-deputy editor of The ... Fifteen years later, in 1992, Jim Rohwer explained in another special report ...
  4. Asia Rising: Amazon.co.uk: Jim Rohwer, Jim Rowher ...

    www.amazon.co.uk › ... › Accounting › International
    Amazon.com, Inc.
    Rating: 5 - ‎5 reviews
    Buy Asia Rising by Jim Rohwer, Jim Rowher (ISBN: 9780684825489) from ... Certainly since my father, Norman Macrae, surveyed Japan's extraordinary growth ...
  5. Amazon.com: Customer Reviews: Asia Rising: Why America ...

    www.amazon.com/Asia-Rising.../0684825481
    Amazon.com, Inc.
    Jim Rohwer's Asia Rising is unquestionably the best book to come out and ..... Certainly since my father, Norman Macrae, surveyed Japan's extraordinary growth ...
  6. Tracking how curriculum of Entrepreneurial Revolution ...

    normanmacrae.ning.com/xn/detail/6339278:Comment:17787
    Dec 17, 2013 - What started Norman Macrae's genre of Entrepreneurial Revolution was .... Megatrends Asia, by John Naisbitt, and Asia Rising, by Jim Rohwer.
  7. Books | Oxford Futures Library

    oxfordfutures.sbs.ox.ac.uk/pierre-wack-memorial-library/.../index.html
    Norman Macrae, The 2024 Report: A Concise History of the Future 1914-2024 .... Jim Rohwer, Asia Rising: Why America will Prosper as Asia's Economies ...
  8. COURRIER INTERNATIONAL no:4 01/12/1992 | Musée de ...

    museedelapresse.com/courrier-international-no-4/
    Translate this page
    ... L'ANNEE DU DRAGON CHINOIS – JIM ROHWER – UN SECOND SOUFFLE ... BBC EST UNE ESCROQUERIE – NORMAN MACRAE – DATA SECTEURS ...
  9. 老江湖——经济学人在中国_爱思网_新浪博客

    blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_5fb3c51d01012t4l.html - Translate this page
    Mar 6, 2012 - As it happens, Norman Macrae, the then-deputy editor of The ... Fifteen years later, in 1992, Jim Rohwer explained in another special report ...
  10. Journaux anciens de collection: COURRIER ...

    www.journaux-collection.com/fiche.php?id=758271
    Translate this page
    ... L'ANNEE DU DRAGON CHINOIS - JIM ROHWER - UN SECOND SOUFFLE ... UNE ESCROQUERIE - NORMAN MACRAE - DATA SECTEURS - ANALYSE ...
  11. 《经济学人》在中国:行家里手- 程阳的日志- 网易博客

    chengyangblog23.blog.163.com/.../21539717320124... - Translate this page
    May 27, 2012 - As it happens, Norman Macrae, the then-deputy editor of The ... Fifteen years later, in 1992, Jim Rohwer explained in another special report ...
  12. Fw: [爆卦] 來自經濟學人對中國的報導 - 批踢踢實業坊

    https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/.../M.1345950090.A.7B3.html
    Translate this page
    Aug 26, 2012 - 14 posts - ‎13 authors
    As it happens, Norman Macrae, the then-deputy editor of The ... Fifteen years later, in 1992, Jim Rohwer explained in another special report ...
  13. 老江湖——经济学人在中国- 经济学人双语精选- 爱思英语学习网

    www.24en.com/coop/ecocn/2012-03.../140375.html
    Translate this page
    Mar 6, 2012 - As it happens, Norman Macrae, the then-deputy editor of The ... Fifteen years later, in 1992, Jim Rohwer explained in another special report ...
  14. [PDF]The Learning Revolution

    cmap.upb.edu.co/rid=1GQBQRQMK.../The-Learning-Revolution.pdf
    Records 1000 - 1200 - Also: Jim Rohwer, Asia. Rising, Nicholas ...... The United Kingdom: Joanna Rose, Sheila Kitzinger, Norman Macrae, David Lewis, Michael.
  15. The Learning Revolution - Scribd

    https://www.scribd.com/doc/205064514/The-Learning-Revolution
    Feb 6, 2014 - Also: Jim Rohwer. 1996). page 38. Being Digital. 1998). John Naisbitt ......Norman Macrae. Malaysia: Terry Netto. Peter M. Jim and Pat Lennox ...
  16. LibraryofMistakes's author cloud | LibraryThing

    www.librarything.com/authorcloud.php?view...
    LibraryThing
    ... Henry Dunning Macleod David S. Macmillan Norman Macrae H. W. Macrosty .... Everett M. Rogers James Harvey Rogers Felix G. Rohatyn Jim Rohwer John ...

In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 16 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.


we map unescap as having been founded by the 5 charter members of the un to focus win-win mapping across asia pacific from 1947 with headquarters chosen in thailand - (as well as un hq other regional uns for africa are connecetd out of nairobi and ethiopia, and central europe out of vienna and geneva

Member States

  • Afghanistan** 24 April 1953
  • Armenia 26 July 1994
  • Australia 28 March 1947
  • Azerbaijan 31 July 1992
  • Bangladesh** 17 April 1973
  • Bhutan** 6 January 1972
  • Brunei Darussalam 26 July 1985
  • Cambodia** 20 August 1954
  • China 28 March 1947
  • Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (the) 31 July 1992
  • Fiji 3 August 1979
  • France 28 March 1947
  • Georgia 25 July2000
  • India 28 March1947
  • Indonesia 28 September1950
  • Iran (Islamic Republic of) 10 July 1958
  • Japan 24 June 1954
  • Kazakhstan 31 July 1992
  • Kiribati** 26 July 1991
  • Kyrgyzstan 31 July 1992
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic (the) **16 February 1955
  • Malaysia 17 September 1957
  • Maldives 5 August 1976
  • Marshall Islands (the) 31 July 1992
  • Micronesia (Federated States of) 31 July 1992
  • Mongolia 21 December 1961
  • Myanmar** 19 April 1948
  • Nauru 20 July 1971
  • Nepal** 6 June 1955
  • Netherlands (the) 28 March 1947
  • New Zealand 8 March 1948
  • Pakistan 30 September 1947
  • Palau 18 July 1996
  • Papua New Guinea 27 August 1976
  • Philippines (the) 28 March 1947
  • Republic of Korea (the) 20 October 1954
  • Russian Federation (the)*** 28 March 1947
  • Samoa 5 July 1963
  • Singapore 21 September 1965
  • Solomon Islands** 3 August 1979
  • Sri Lanka 10 December 1954
  • Tajikistan 31 July 1992
  • Thailand 28 March 1947
  • Timor-Leste** 18 July 2003
  • Tonga 20 July 1971
  • Turkey 18 July 1996
  • Turkmenistan 31 July 1992
  • Tuvalu ** 26 July 1985
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the) 28 March 1947
  • United States of America (the) 28 March 1947
  • Uzbekistan 31 July 1992
  • Vanuatu** 27 July 1984
  • Viet Nam 23 August 1954

Associate Members*

  • American Samoa 28 July 1988
  • Cook Islands (the) 11 July 1972
  • French Polynesia 31 July 1992
  • Guam 24 July 1981
  • Hong Kong, China**** 25 November 1947
  • Macao, China ***** 26 July 1991
  • New Caledonia 31 July 1992
  • Niue 3 August 1979
  • Northern Mariana Islands (the) 22 July 1986

Notes:
* Not a member of the United Nations
** Least Developed Country
*** Continuation of membership of former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
**** Change of name from Hong Kong to Hong Kong, China (1 July 1997)
***** Change of name to Macau, China (20 December 1999) and further changed to Macao, China (4 February 2000)

Blog Archive

  • ►  2022 (6)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (2)
  • ►  2021 (29)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (6)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ▼  2020 (38)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (8)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ▼  April (3)
      • korea
      • designing direct cash transfer benchmark models f...
      • korea month april 2020 this post aug 2020
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2019 (60)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (16)
    • ►  September (8)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (4)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2018 (29)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  April (5)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (7)
  • ►  2017 (17)
    • ►  December (8)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2016 (13)
    • ►  December (6)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ►  2015 (19)
    • ►  December (9)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2014 (1)
    • ►  December (1)
  • ►  2013 (4)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2012 (2)
    • ►  December (2)
  • ►  2011 (6)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2010 (1)
    • ►  December (1)
  • ►  2009 (1)
    • ►  December (1)
  • ►  2008 (2)
    • ►  December (2)
  • ►  2007 (5)
    • ►  December (5)
  • ►  2006 (4)
    • ►  December (4)
  • ►  2005 (5)
    • ►  December (5)
  • ►  2004 (3)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  September (1)
  • ►  2003 (2)
    • ►  December (2)
  • ►  2002 (2)
    • ►  December (2)
  • ►  2001 (1)
    • ►  December (1)
  • ►  2000 (2)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  April (1)
  • ►  1999 (2)
    • ►  December (2)
  • ►  1998 (5)
    • ►  December (5)
  • ►  1997 (2)
    • ►  December (2)
  • ►  1996 (1)
    • ►  December (1)
  • ►  1995 (2)
    • ►  December (2)
  • ►  1994 (1)
    • ►  December (1)
  • ►  1993 (1)
    • ►  December (1)
  • ►  1992 (1)
    • ►  December (1)
  • ►  1991 (1)
    • ►  December (1)
  • ►  1990 (1)
    • ►  December (1)
  • ►  1989 (1)
    • ►  December (1)
  • ►  1988 (1)
    • ►  December (1)
  • ►  1984 (8)
    • ►  December (8)
  • ►  1982 (1)
    • ►  December (1)
  • ►  1977 (1)
    • ►  May (1)
  • ►  1976 (1)
    • ►  December (1)
  • ►  1972 (1)
    • ►  December (1)
  • ►  1971 (3)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  1970 (12)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  January (7)



Join us in exploring economics: designed to invest in next generation's livelihoods starting with ending being born into poverty- and voicelessness over the future's possibilities.

Asia explorations have helped us map this more than anywhere else including:
*Japan since 1962 with father and The Economist
China with The Economist Asia Team since 1972
Bangladesh village networks since 2005 eg grameen.tv and brac.tv
Pre-war Korea with my uncle once removed
Gandhi's Inidian
Independence wit my maternal granfater 1921-1946
With Asia's and Africa's elearning satellite yazmi since 2014
With youth-valuation emerging open society views - eg Soros, Gorbachev, Nobel Peace, Preferential Option Poor since 1984
With womens empowerment valuation networks since 2012

2020 is 44th year since my father at the economist started linking in those who saw china's race of one fifth of the world's people ending poverty as determining whether human sustainability would be possible- survey 1977 in the economist, bad actors response in dc 1978, .. as schwarzman has said, china is a core curriculum for any child of the 21st century seeking human sustainability-see deans from oxford, mit and tsinghua who agree- who else are people working courageously to celebrate sustainability knowhow and exchanges between chinese youth and other national-when can you next zoom:

china institute/ peking u alumni of ny
ny time sept 16 7pm -china's 2020 deadline to end poverty
with pbs kuhn & getzels
columbia u poverty researcher qin gao
un's wenyan yang
dexter roberts, author

klaus schwab annual world forum celebrating china's new champion and 5 meta hubs linking in 4th industrial revolution between san fran, tokyo, beijing, delhi, geneva

bloomberg - in normal years 2 main summits hosted - un sdgs, trade with china

brookings china author cheng li
thinktank china centre globalisation
unicorn author and silcon dragon host rebecca fannin

un's special adviser on tech for youth livelihood - jack ma
lifes work of kissinger
...


How can your family networks linkin (9500)chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk

About Me

chris macrae
chrismacrae.com youtube washington dc email chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk linkedin 9500 skype chrismacraedc co-author with The Economist's Norman Macrae 1984's 2025Report - 40 years to transform education and save our species
View my complete profile
Simple theme. Powered by Blogger.